Skip to main content

Historical Word Problems - Practical or Abstract?


If we have learned anything from our mathematical past, it's that the world never splits cleanly into practical problems and abstract problems. A few simple examples of this might be the number π, which started very simply as a practical relationship between the circumference and diameter of a circle, but can also be calculated in a very abstract way with an infinite series (the Leibniz formula for π/4). Another example might be the many number theorist who prided themselves in pure abstraction of their field, only for a practical uses for their methods coming with the arrival of computers and the need for encryption techniques. 

This article brings up some interesting interplay between practicality and abstraction in ancient Babylonian word problems. Firstly it seems clear, from the examples provided at the beginning and throughout the text, that many word problems were inspired by what was familiar in their everyday lives, so in a sense they have a level of practicality in that they are related to a problem they might have faced in real life. However, they also move into the abstract, dealing with numbers much larger or simpler (integer answers) than would be realistic. 

To me, it seems the lines between 'pure' and 'applied', or between 'practical' and 'abstract' are constantly being blurred both in problems created to test and grow a student's understanding, and in real-world problems that need solving. In the created questions, an element of practicality is often added to an abstract problem to make it more tangible and relatable. In a real-world problem, the solution is often found by finding an abstraction of the practical problem (such as an algebraic formulation of the problem), solving that, and then applying the solution back to the original problem. 

There seems to be a constant interplay between pure and applied mathematics, and that idea should be inspiration in our modern context for a teacher to take lessons in the classroom out of the abstract (where lessons traditionally live) and into the practical, getting students to use their hands and their bodies and the world around them to engage in learning. 

Comments

  1. Lovely articulation of the shifting relationships between pure and applied mathematics. I especially like your point that real world problems are often found through abstraction.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A response to Integrating history of mathematics in the classroom

          As someone who grew up learning math in the “traditional” way, presented primarily with objective theorems and axioms, math history was often provided as a side-dish not meant to be incorporated with the entrée. If you had already eaten your fill with the main course, you could forget the side-dish, it was interesting, perhaps, but certainly not essential. Additionally, this “side-dish” of math history was inevitably European centric. It lacked the intense spices found in traditional Indian cuisine, the fragrant herbs from Arabic cooking, or the rich flavours of Chinese and other east Asian foods. This, predictably, contributed heavily to my own philosophy around math education but this chapter by Tzanakis, C. et al . has opened my eyes in a number of ways.             Something that jumped out at me immediately, from section 7.3.2 was the idea of integrating history directly into the teaching of math. The idea o...

Gematria - EDCP 442, Assignment 3, Ben and Tim

Gematria - EDCP 442, Assignment 3, Ben and Tim The topic we chose for our Assignment 3 inquiry and art project was a traditional Jewish numerology called Gematria . It was, and still is, used by certain Jewish rabbis to exegete their scriptures. It is not found in every Jewish tradition but is most closely associated with a particular mystical branch of Judaism called Kabbalah . This hermeneutical technique begins with assigning each letter in the alphabet with a number. In the diversity of the Jewish tradition, this is done in many different ways however we focused on one of the more common methods knowns as מספר הכרחי ( Mispar Hekhreḥi , normative value or essential number). In this method, the numbers start at one, increase by one each time until 10, then increase by 10 each time until 100, and then increase by 100 each time until the final letter. This is shown in the chart below. The number of a word or phrase is determined by simply adding all the numbers of each letter together...